matrisx.com
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccountPricing
TR·EN
TR·EN
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccount
Analytics platform · not a betting siteTrack recordThe last 7 daysLegal noticeRefund policyPrivacyiletisim@matrisx.comFollow on X
← Fixtures

Bundesliga · Germany · Regular Season - 32

FC Augsburg–Holstein Kiel

1–3

HT 0–2

Kick-off
Sunday, 4 May 2025 at 13:30
Status
Match Finished
Venue
WWK Arena, Augsburg
𝕏Share on X

What the model said, and what happened

✗ Incorrect — we gave this result 22%

This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record

Goals and red cards

  • 25'⚽Holstein KielS. Machino (penalty)
  • 40'⚽Holstein KielA. Bernhardsson
  • 51'⚽Holstein KielA. Bernhardsson (assist: S. Skrzybski)
  • 90'⚽FC AugsburgS. Mounie

Match statistics

Match statistics
FC AugsburgHolstein Kiel
27Shots7
10Shots on target5
16Shots inside the box6
1Goalkeeper saves9
12Corners0
2Offsides0
72%Possession28%
592Passes238
517Accurate passes

What we expected, and what happened

  • Expected goals before kick-off: FC Augsburg 1.56 · Holstein Kiel 1.26. On the pitch: 1-3.
  • Shots FC Augsburg 27 · Holstein Kiel 7; on target 10 and 5.
  • FC Augsburg kept the ball more (72%).

Referee

H. Osmers→

4.35

yellows per match

0.23

reds per match

80

matches of data

Model prediction

Why this prediction?

  • ·The model puts the most likely outcome at 54.0%: “FC Augsburg to win”. Second comes “a draw” at 24.2%.
  • ·Behind that distribution are the expected goals: 1.87 for FC Augsburg, 1.15 for Holstein Kiel.
  • ·The highest double chance value is 78.3% (1X — FC Augsburg win or draw).
  • ·These values were computed from 897 past matches.

This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.

These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.

FC Augsburg to win54.0%
Draw24.2%
Holstein Kiel to win21.7%

When the model has said 50–55% in the past, 1,337 of 2,542 predictions were correct (52.6%). Accuracy record →

169
4Fouls20
0Yellow cards2
0Red cards0

The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.

Both teams to score
60.8%

When the model has said 60–65% in the past, 1,567 of 2,553 predictions were correct (61.4%). Accuracy record →

Double chance

1X — FC Augsburg win or draw78.3%
12 — any result other than a draw75.8%
X2 — draw or Holstein Kiel win46.0%

These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (24.2%).

First half

Actual: 0–2
FC Augsburg lead at half-time38.1%
Level at half-time37.8%
Holstein Kiel lead at half-time24.0%

First-half double chance

1X — FC Augsburg ahead or level76.0%
12 — not level at half-time62.2%
X2 — level or Holstein Kiel ahead61.9%

These values are not a fraction of the full-match prediction; they come from a separate model trained on the first-half scores of 897 matches. Its edge over the base rate is markedly smaller than the full-match model's — the measured figure is on the accuracy record. Read them more cautiously. First-half goal markets are not published because they failed to beat the base rate.

Expected fouls and corners

Fouls

FC Augsburg
at least 10Actual: 4
Holstein Kiel
at least 10Actual: 20

Corners

FC Augsburg
at least 5
Holstein Kiel
at least 3

These figures are set to hold in at least 60% of matches; in the rest the count comes in below them. No upper bound is stated — we make no "at most" claim. Yellow cards were measured and are not published: there our model did not beat the historical average.

Goals market

The 3+ goals prediction is not published for this match.

The model gives a probability below the baseline (60.5%). In backtesting the model's edge in the "fewer goals" direction could not be confirmed; we don't publish an unconfirmed prediction.

What these probabilities rest on

Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.

How many goals FC Augsburg score1.56

Attack: FC Augsburg score below the league average (28% fewer).

Opponent's defence: Holstein Kiel concede 20% more than the league average, which pushes the expectation up.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.56 goals (including home advantage).

How many goals Holstein Kiel score1.26

Attack: Holstein Kiel score close to the league average.

Opponent's defence: FC Augsburg's defence is close to the league average (0.92×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.26 goals (including the away penalty).

Most likely scorelines

1–111.9%2–110.8%2–08.6%

A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.

Ratings were computed from 897 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 31 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.