Segunda División · Spain · Regular Season - 3

Granada CF–Mirandes

1–2

HT 0–0

Kick-off: Sunday, 31 August 2025 at 19:30
Status: Match Finished
Venue: Estadio Nuevo Los Carmenes, Granada

What the model said, and what happened

Incorrect — we gave this result 23%

This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record

Goals and red cards

48'Granada CFPere Haro · red card
49'MirandesC. Fernandez (penalty)
73'Granada CFPablo Sáenz (assist: Pedro Alemañ)
85'MirandesG. Petit (assist: Juan Gutiérrez)

Match statistics

Match statistics
Granada CF		Mirandes
15	Shots	11
4	Shots on target	4
9	Shots inside the box	7
2	Goalkeeper saves	3
6	Corners	1
1	Offsides	1
61%	Possession	39%
440	Passes	288
387	Accurate passes

What we expected, and what happened

Expected goals before kick-off: Granada CF 1.37 · Mirandes 1.12. On the pitch: 1-2.
Shots Granada CF 15 · Mirandes 11; on target 4 and 4.
Granada CF kept the ball more (61%).

Referee

M. H. De Aza→

4.00

yellows per match

0.00

reds per match

matches of data

1 matches is a small sample — these averages are noisy and should not be read as a tendency.

Model prediction

Why this prediction?

The model puts the most likely outcome at 47.8%: “Granada CF to win”. Second comes “a draw” at 29.0%.
Behind that distribution are the expected goals: 1.41 for Granada CF, 0.92 for Mirandes.
The highest double chance value is 76.7% (1X — Granada CF win or draw).
These values were computed from 1,416 past matches.

This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.

These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.

Granada CF to win47.8%

Draw29.0%

Mirandes to win23.3%

When the model has said 45–50% in the past, 1,541 of 3,251 predictions were correct (47.4%). Accuracy record →

15	Fouls	20

2	Yellow cards	2

1	Red cards	0

First half

Actual: 0–0

Granada CF lead at half-time39.9%

Level at half-time44.9%

Mirandes lead at half-time15.3%

First-half double chance

1X — Granada CF ahead or level84.7%

12 — not level at half-time55.1%

X2 — level or Mirandes ahead60.1%

These values are not a fraction of the full-match prediction; they come from a separate model trained on the first-half scores of 1416 matches. Its edge over the base rate is markedly smaller than the full-match model's — the measured figure is on the accuracy record. Read them more cautiously. First-half goal markets are not published because they failed to beat the base rate.

Expected fouls and corners

Fouls

Granada CF: at least 13Actual: 15
Mirandes: at least 12Actual: 20

Corners

Granada CF: at least 4Actual: 6
Mirandes: at least 3Actual: 1

These figures are set to hold in at least 60% of matches; in the rest the count comes in below them. No upper bound is stated — we make no "at most" claim. Yellow cards were measured and are not published: there our model did not beat the historical average.

What these probabilities rest on

Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.

How many goals Granada CF score1.37

Attack: Granada CF score close to the league average.

Opponent's defence: Mirandes concede 18% fewer than the league average, which pulls the expectation down.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.37 goals (including home advantage).

How many goals Mirandes score1.12

Attack: Mirandes score close to the league average.

Opponent's defence: Granada CF's defence is close to the league average (1.05×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.12 goals (including the away penalty).

Most likely scorelines

1–114.6%1–013.0%2–09.8%

A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.

Week 3 of the season. This prediction was computed from previous seasons. Summer transfers, budget changes and squad rebuilds aren't in the ratings yet — the model can only see that a team has been rebuilt once new results come in.

We measured this: the bias is only pronounced in the opening week. In this week the model's overall accuracy does not separate from the rest of the season — that is, we found no measurable flaw. The one tendency across all opening weeks is that home wins are called slightly too often (said 43.0%, got 41.9%; n=583).

This sample is small and not statistically established, which is why we do not correct the model for it. The correction we tried (pulling probabilities toward the league average) didn't win on holdout, so it wasn't added. Read opening-week predictions with a little more caution.