matrisx.com
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccountPricing
TR·EN
TR·EN
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccount
Analytics platform · not a betting siteTrack recordThe last 7 daysLegal noticeRefund policyPrivacyiletisim@matrisx.comFollow on X
← Fixtures

Ligue 1 · France · Regular Season - 29

Lens–Paris Saint Germain

0–2

HT 0–1

Kick-off
Wednesday, 13 May 2026 at 19:00
Status
Match Finished
Venue
Stade Bollaert-Delelis, Lens
𝕏Share on X

What the model said, and what happened

✓ Prediction correct

This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record

Goals and red cards

  • 29'⚽Paris Saint GermainK. Kvaratskhelia (assist: O. Dembele)
  • 90'⚽Paris Saint GermainI. Mbaye (assist: D. Doué)

Match statistics

Match statistics
LensParis Saint Germain
25Shots10
10Shots on target3
19Shots inside the box8
1Goalkeeper saves8
6Corners3
3Offsides1
38%Possession62%
419Passes716
333Accurate passes

What we expected, and what happened

  • Expected goals before kick-off: Lens 1.26 · Paris Saint Germain 1.70. On the pitch: 0-2.
  • Shots Lens 25 · Paris Saint Germain 10; on target 10 and 3.
  • Paris Saint Germain kept the ball more (62%).

Referee

B. Bastien→

4.08

yellows per match

0.19

reds per match

100

matches of data

Model prediction

Why this prediction?

  • ·The model puts the most likely outcome at 46.8%: “Paris Saint Germain to win”. Second comes “Lens to win” at 29.8%.
  • ·Behind that distribution are the expected goals: 1.57 for Lens, 1.97 for Paris Saint Germain.
  • ·The highest double chance value is 76.6% (12 — any result other than a draw).
  • ·These values were computed from 1,288 past matches.

This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.

These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.

Lens to win29.8%
Draw23.4%
Paris Saint Germain to win46.8%

When the model has said 45–50% in the past, 1,541 of 3,251 predictions were correct (47.4%). Accuracy record →

631
9Fouls3
0Yellow cards1
0Red cards0

The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.

Both teams to score
71.7%

When the model has said 70–75% in the past, 113 of 165 predictions were correct (68.5%). Accuracy record →

Double chance

1X — Lens win or draw53.2%
12 — any result other than a draw76.6%
X2 — draw or Paris Saint Germain win70.2%

These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (23.4%).

First half

Actual: 0–1
Lens lead at half-time17.8%
Level at half-time39.9%
Paris Saint Germain lead at half-time42.3%

First-half double chance

1X — Lens ahead or level57.7%
12 — not level at half-time60.1%
X2 — level or Paris Saint Germain ahead82.2%

These values are not a fraction of the full-match prediction; they come from a separate model trained on the first-half scores of 1288 matches. Its edge over the base rate is markedly smaller than the full-match model's — the measured figure is on the accuracy record. Read them more cautiously. First-half goal markets are not published because they failed to beat the base rate.

Expected fouls and corners

Fouls

Lens
at least 10Actual: 9
Paris Saint Germain
at least 9Actual: 3

Corners

Lens
at least 4Actual: 6
Paris Saint Germain
at least 3Actual: 3

These figures are set to hold in at least 60% of matches; in the rest the count comes in below them. No upper bound is stated — we make no "at most" claim. Yellow cards were measured and are not published: there our model did not beat the historical average.

Goals market

3+ goals70.1%

When the model has said 70–75% in the past, 405 of 553 predictions were correct (73.2%). Accuracy record →

The league's historical "3+ goals" rate is 54.6%. For this match the model gives a value above that baseline — and in backtesting the model's edge was confirmed only in this direction.

What these probabilities rest on

Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.

How many goals Lens score1.26

Attack: Lens score above the league average (28% more).

Opponent's defence: Paris Saint Germain concede 36% below the league average — a defence that seriously brakes even a strong attack.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.26 goals (including home advantage).

How many goals Paris Saint Germain score1.70

Attack: Paris Saint Germain score 57% more than the league's average team — one of the sharpest attacks in the league.

Opponent's defence: Lens's defence is close to the league average (0.88×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.70 goals (including the away penalty).

Most likely scorelines

1–110.0%1–29.7%2–27.7%

A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.

Ratings were computed from 1288 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 138 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.