matrisx.com
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccountPricing
TR·EN
TR·EN
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccount
Analytics platform · not a betting siteTrack recordThe last 7 daysLegal noticeRefund policyPrivacyiletisim@matrisx.comFollow on X
← Fixtures

Ligue 1 · France · Regular Season - 31

Rennes–Nantes

2–1

HT 1–1

Kick-off
Sunday, 26 April 2026 at 15:15
Status
Match Finished
Venue
Roazhon Park, Rennes
𝕏Share on X

What the model said, and what happened

✓ Prediction correct

This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record

Goals and red cards

  • 8'⚽RennesEsteban Lepaul (penalty)
  • 40'⚽NantesI. Ganago (assist: Nicolas Cozza)
  • 90'⚽RennesValentin Rongier

Match statistics

Match statistics
RennesNantes
14Shots24
5Shots on target8
8Shots inside the box21
6Goalkeeper saves3
6Corners8
5Offsides1
63%Possession37%
466Passes260
393Accurate passes

What we expected, and what happened

  • Expected goals before kick-off: Rennes 1.93 · Nantes 0.88. On the pitch: 2-1.
  • Shots Rennes 14 · Nantes 24; on target 5 and 8.
  • Rennes kept the ball more (63%).

Referee

B. Bastien→

4.05

yellows per match

0.19

reds per match

98

matches of data

Model prediction

Why this prediction?

  • ·The model puts the most likely outcome at 65.7%: “Rennes to win”. Second comes “a draw” at 20.9%.
  • ·Behind that distribution are the expected goals: 2.11 for Rennes, 0.90 for Nantes.
  • ·The highest double chance value is 86.5% (1X — Rennes win or draw).
  • ·These values were computed from 1,265 past matches.

This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.

These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.

Rennes to win65.7%
Draw20.9%
Nantes to win13.5%

When the model has said 65–70% in the past, 675 of 977 predictions were correct (69.1%). Accuracy record →

Both teams to score
185
15Fouls15
3Yellow cards2
0Red cards0

The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.

54.8%

When the model has said 50–55% in the past, 2,597 of 5,092 predictions were correct (51.0%). Accuracy record →

Double chance

1X — Rennes win or draw86.5%
12 — any result other than a draw79.1%
X2 — draw or Nantes win34.3%

These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (20.9%).

First half

Actual: 1–1
Rennes lead at half-time48.7%
Level at half-time38.3%
Nantes lead at half-time13.1%

First-half double chance

1X — Rennes ahead or level86.9%
12 — not level at half-time61.7%
X2 — level or Nantes ahead51.3%

These values are not a fraction of the full-match prediction; they come from a separate model trained on the first-half scores of 1265 matches. Its edge over the base rate is markedly smaller than the full-match model's — the measured figure is on the accuracy record. Read them more cautiously. First-half goal markets are not published because they failed to beat the base rate.

Expected fouls and corners

Fouls

Rennes
at least 12Actual: 15
Nantes
at least 11Actual: 15

Corners

Rennes
at least 6Actual: 6
Nantes
at least 2Actual: 8

These figures are set to hold in at least 60% of matches; in the rest the count comes in below them. No upper bound is stated — we make no "at most" claim. Yellow cards were measured and are not published: there our model did not beat the historical average.

Goals market

3+ goals58.7%

When the model has said 55–60% in the past, 1,529 of 2,653 predictions were correct (57.6%). Accuracy record →

The league's historical "3+ goals" rate is 54.5%. For this match the model gives a value above that baseline — and in backtesting the model's edge was confirmed only in this direction.

What these probabilities rest on

Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.

How many goals Rennes score1.93

Attack: Rennes score above the league average (16% more).

Opponent's defence: Nantes's defence is close to the league average (1.04×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.93 goals (including home advantage).

How many goals Nantes score0.88

Attack: Nantes score below the league average (28% fewer).

Opponent's defence: Rennes's defence is close to the league average (0.96×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 0.88 goals (including the away penalty).

Most likely scorelines

2–011.3%2–110.9%1–110.5%

A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.

Ratings were computed from 1265 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 136 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.