matrisx.com
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccountPricing
TR·EN
TR·EN
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccount
Analytics platform · not a betting siteTrack recordThe last 7 daysLegal noticeRefund policyPrivacyiletisim@matrisx.comFollow on X
← Fixtures

Ligue 1 · France · Regular Season - 21

Lens–Rennes

3–1

HT 1–1

Kick-off
Saturday, 7 February 2026 at 16:00
Status
Match Finished
Venue
Stade Bollaert-Delelis, Lens
𝕏Share on X

What the model said, and what happened

✓ Prediction correct

This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record

Goals and red cards

  • 8'⚽RennesEsteban Lepaul (assist: A. Nordin)
  • 41'⚽LensO. Edouard (assist: R. Aguilar)
  • 54'⚽LensR. Aguilar (assist: F. Thauvin)
  • 56'LensR. Aguilar · red card
  • 78'⚽LensA. Saint-Maximin (assist: R. Risser)

Match statistics

Match statistics
LensRennes
9Shots14
3Shots on target1
4Shots inside the box9
0Goalkeeper saves0
4Corners4
2Offsides1
51%Possession49%
432Passes398
365Accurate passes

What we expected, and what happened

  • Expected goals before kick-off: Lens 1.85 · Rennes 1.10. On the pitch: 3-1.
  • Shots Lens 9 · Rennes 14; on target 3 and 1.

Referee

J. Pignard→

4.38

yellows per match

0.30

reds per match

74

matches of data

Model prediction

Why this prediction?

  • ·The model puts the most likely outcome at 61.2%: “Lens to win”. Second comes “a draw” at 21.6%.
  • ·Behind that distribution are the expected goals: 2.13 for Lens, 1.10 for Rennes.
  • ·The highest double chance value is 82.8% (1X — Lens win or draw).
  • ·These values were computed from 1,173 past matches.

This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.

These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.

Lens to win61.2%
Draw21.6%
Rennes to win17.2%

When the model has said 60–65% in the past, 847 of 1,354 predictions were correct (62.6%). Accuracy record →

Both teams to score
340
13Fouls17
4Yellow cards2
1Red cards0

The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.

61.7%

When the model has said 60–65% in the past, 1,567 of 2,553 predictions were correct (61.4%). Accuracy record →

Double chance

1X — Lens win or draw82.8%
12 — any result other than a draw78.4%
X2 — draw or Rennes win38.8%

These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (21.6%).

First half

Actual: 1–1
Lens lead at half-time35.9%
Level at half-time42.3%
Rennes lead at half-time21.9%

First-half double chance

1X — Lens ahead or level78.1%
12 — not level at half-time57.7%
X2 — level or Rennes ahead64.1%

These values are not a fraction of the full-match prediction; they come from a separate model trained on the first-half scores of 1173 matches. Its edge over the base rate is markedly smaller than the full-match model's — the measured figure is on the accuracy record. Read them more cautiously. First-half goal markets are not published because they failed to beat the base rate.

Expected fouls and corners

Fouls

Lens
at least 12Actual: 13
Rennes
at least 11Actual: 17

Corners

Lens
at least 5Actual: 4
Rennes
at least 3Actual: 4

These figures are set to hold in at least 60% of matches; in the rest the count comes in below them. No upper bound is stated — we make no "at most" claim. Yellow cards were measured and are not published: there our model did not beat the historical average.

Goals market

3+ goals63.7%

When the model has said 60–65% in the past, 1,139 of 1,798 predictions were correct (63.3%). Accuracy record →

The league's historical "3+ goals" rate is 54.6%. For this match the model gives a value above that baseline — and in backtesting the model's edge was confirmed only in this direction.

What these probabilities rest on

Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.

How many goals Lens score1.85

Attack: Lens score above the league average (17% more).

Opponent's defence: Rennes's defence is close to the league average (1.00×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.85 goals (including home advantage).

How many goals Rennes score1.10

Attack: Rennes score close to the league average.

Opponent's defence: Lens concede 17% fewer than the league average, which pulls the expectation down.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.10 goals (including the away penalty).

Most likely scorelines

2–110.9%1–110.3%2–09.1%

A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.

Ratings were computed from 1173 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 126 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.