matrisx.com
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccountPricing
TR·EN
TR·EN
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccount
Analytics platform · not a betting siteTrack recordThe last 7 daysLegal noticeRefund policyPrivacyiletisim@matrisx.comFollow on X
← Fixtures

Serie A · Italy · Regular Season - 7

Como–Juventus

2–0

HT 1–0

Kick-off
Sunday, 19 October 2025 at 10:30
Status
Match Finished
Venue
Stadio Giuseppe Sinigaglia, Como
𝕏Share on X

What the model said, and what happened

✗ Incorrect — we gave this result 30%✓ double chance: correct

This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record

Goals and red cards

  • 4'⚽ComoMarc Kempf (assist: Nico Paz)
  • 79'⚽ComoNico Paz (assist: Máximo Perrone)

Match statistics

Match statistics
ComoJuventus
12Shots15
6Shots on target3
9Shots inside the box9
4Goalkeeper saves4
4Corners1
1Offsides2
45%Possession55%
361Passes447
293Accurate passes

What we expected, and what happened

  • Expected goals before kick-off: Como 1.09 · Juventus 1.21. On the pitch: 2-0.
  • Shots Como 12 · Juventus 15; on target 6 and 3.
  • Juventus kept the ball more (55%).

Referee

Giovanni Ayroldi, Italy→

5.00

yellows per match

0.33

reds per match

3

matches of data

3 matches is a small sample — these averages are noisy and should not be read as a tendency.

Model prediction

Why this prediction?

  • ·The model puts the most likely outcome at 41.2%: “Juventus to win”. Second comes “Como to win” at 30.0%.
  • ·Behind that distribution are the expected goals: 1.14 for Como, 1.36 for Juventus.
  • ·The highest double chance value is 71.2% (12 — any result other than a draw).
  • ·These values were computed from 1,204 past matches.

This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.

These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.

Como to win30.0%
Draw28.8%
Juventus to win41.2%

When the model has said 40–45% in the past, 1,778 of 3,998 predictions were correct (44.5%). Accuracy record →

373
12Fouls15
3Yellow cards1
0Red cards0

The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.

Both teams to score
53.7%

When the model has said 50–55% in the past, 2,597 of 5,092 predictions were correct (51.0%). Accuracy record →

Double chance

1X — Como win or draw58.8%
12 — any result other than a draw71.2%
X2 — draw or Juventus win70.0%

These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (28.8%).

First half

Actual: 1–0
Como lead at half-time29.1%
Level at half-time46.7%
Juventus lead at half-time24.2%

First-half double chance

1X — Como ahead or level75.8%
12 — not level at half-time53.3%
X2 — level or Juventus ahead70.9%

These values are not a fraction of the full-match prediction; they come from a separate model trained on the first-half scores of 1204 matches. Its edge over the base rate is markedly smaller than the full-match model's — the measured figure is on the accuracy record. Read them more cautiously. First-half goal markets are not published because they failed to beat the base rate.

Expected fouls and corners

Fouls

Como
at least 11Actual: 12
Juventus
at least 13Actual: 15

Corners

Como
at least 4Actual: 4
Juventus
at least 4Actual: 1

These figures are set to hold in at least 60% of matches; in the rest the count comes in below them. No upper bound is stated — we make no "at most" claim. Yellow cards were measured and are not published: there our model did not beat the historical average.

Goals market

The 3+ goals prediction is not published for this match.

The model gives a probability below the baseline (47.2%). In backtesting the model's edge in the "fewer goals" direction could not be confirmed; we don't publish an unconfirmed prediction.

What these probabilities rest on

Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.

How many goals Como score1.09

Attack: Como score close to the league average.

Opponent's defence: Juventus concede 23% fewer than the league average, which pulls the expectation down.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.09 goals (including home advantage).

How many goals Juventus score1.21

Attack: Juventus score close to the league average.

Opponent's defence: Como's defence is close to the league average (0.90×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.21 goals (including the away penalty).

Most likely scorelines

1–114.7%0–110.3%1–29.5%

A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.

Ratings were computed from 1204 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 44 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.