UEFA Europa Conference League · Playoff round
HT 0–1
Ended level — we gave the draw 24%double chance: correct
This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record
| Heart Of Midlothian | Rapid Vienna | |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Shots | 9 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 4 | Corners | 5 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0 |
| 39% | Possession | 61% |
| 418 | Passes | 651 |
| 346 | Accurate passes |
2.80
yellows per match
0.20
reds per match
5
matches of data
5 matches is a small sample — these averages are noisy and should not be read as a tendency.
This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.
These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.
When the model has said 50–55% in the past, 1,337 of 2,542 predictions were correct (52.6%). Accuracy record →
| 563 |
| 8 | Fouls | 17 |
|---|
| 1 | Yellow cards | 3 |
|---|
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
|---|
The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.
When the model has said 45–50% in the past, 1,425 of 3,100 predictions were correct (46.0%). Accuracy record →
These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (24.2%).
The 3+ goals prediction is not published for this match.
The model gives a probability below the baseline (51.6%). In backtesting the model's edge in the "fewer goals" direction could not be confirmed; we don't publish an unconfirmed prediction.
Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.
Attack: Heart Of Midlothian score close to the league average.
Opponent's defence: Rapid Vienna's defence is close to the league average (0.89×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.
Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.61 goals (including home advantage).
Attack: Rapid Vienna score close to the league average.
Opponent's defence: Heart Of Midlothian concede 25% fewer than the league average, which pulls the expectation down.
Result: These two effects give an expectation of 0.93 goals (including the away penalty).
A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.
Ratings were computed from 1545 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 131 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.