Super Liga · Serbia · Regular Season - 3

Železničar Pančevo–Mladost Lucani

0–0

HT 0–0

Kick-off: Monday, 3 August 2026 at 19:00
Status: Match Finished

What the model said, and what happened

Ended level — we gave the draw 25%double chance: correct

This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record

Match statistics

Match statistics
Železničar Pančevo		Mladost Lucani
18	Shots	7
6	Shots on target	1
9	Shots inside the box	5
2	Goalkeeper saves	5
9	Corners	0
1	Offsides	3
75%	Possession	25%
678	Passes	228
612	Accurate passes

What we expected, and what happened

Expected goals before kick-off: Železničar Pančevo 1.66 · Mladost Lucani 0.71. On the pitch: 0-0.
Shots Železničar Pančevo 18 · Mladost Lucani 7; on target 6 and 1.
Železničar Pančevo kept the ball more (75%).

Referee

A. Zivkovic→

4.83

yellows per match

0.33

reds per match

matches of data

6 matches is a small sample — these averages are noisy and should not be read as a tendency.

Model prediction

Why this prediction?

The model puts the most likely outcome at 60.3%: “Železničar Pančevo to win”. Second comes “a draw” at 25.4%.
Behind that distribution are the expected goals: 1.66 for Železničar Pančevo, 0.71 for Mladost Lucani.
The highest double chance value is 85.7% (1X — Železničar Pančevo win or draw).
These values were computed from 1,090 past matches.

This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.

These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.

Železničar Pančevo to win60.3%

Draw25.4%

Mladost Lucani to win14.3%

When the model has said 60–65% in the past, 1,325 of 2,113 predictions were correct (62.7%). Accuracy record →

10	Fouls	16

2	Yellow cards	2

0	Red cards	0

First half

Actual: 0–0

Železničar Pančevo lead at half-time40.2%

Level at half-time44.4%

Mladost Lucani lead at half-time15.4%

First-half double chance

1X — Železničar Pančevo ahead or level84.6%

12 — not level at half-time55.6%

X2 — level or Mladost Lucani ahead59.8%

These values are not a fraction of the full-match prediction; they come from a separate model trained on the first-half scores of 1090 matches. Its edge over the base rate is markedly smaller than the full-match model's — the measured figure is on the accuracy record. Read them more cautiously. First-half goal markets are not published because they failed to beat the base rate.

Expected fouls and corners

Fouls

Železničar Pančevo: at least 12Actual: 10
Mladost Lucani: at least 12Actual: 16

Corners

Železničar Pančevo: at least 5
Mladost Lucani: at least 3

These figures are set to hold in at least 60% of matches; in the rest the count comes in below them. No upper bound is stated — we make no "at most" claim. Yellow cards were measured and are not published: there our model did not beat the historical average.

What these probabilities rest on

Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.

How many goals Železničar Pančevo score1.66

Attack: Železničar Pančevo score close to the league average.

Opponent's defence: Mladost Lucani's defence is close to the league average (1.10×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.66 goals (including home advantage).

How many goals Mladost Lucani score0.71

Attack: Mladost Lucani score below the league average (35% fewer).

Opponent's defence: Železničar Pančevo concede 19% fewer than the league average, which pulls the expectation down.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 0.71 goals (including the away penalty).

Most likely scorelines

1–015.0%2–013.3%1–112.6%

A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.

Week 3 of the season. This prediction was computed from previous seasons. Summer transfers, budget changes and squad rebuilds aren't in the ratings yet — the model can only see that a team has been rebuilt once new results come in.

We measured this: the bias is only pronounced in the opening week. In this week the model's overall accuracy does not separate from the rest of the season — that is, we found no measurable flaw. The one tendency across all opening weeks is that home wins are called slightly too often (said 43.0%, got 41.9%; n=583).

This sample is small and not statistically established, which is why we do not correct the model for it. The correction we tried (pulling probabilities toward the league average) didn't win on holdout, so it wasn't added. Read opening-week predictions with a little more caution.