matrisx.com
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccountPricing
TR·EN
TR·EN
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccount
Analytics platform · not a betting siteTrack recordThe last 7 daysLegal noticeRefund policyPrivacyiletisim@matrisx.comFollow on X
← Fixtures

Czech Liga · Czech-Republic · Regular Season - 10

Plzen–Zlin

0–1

HT 0–1

Kick-off
Sunday, 28 September 2025 at 16:30
Status
Match Finished
𝕏Share on X

What the model said, and what happened

✗ Incorrect — we gave this result 8%

This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record

Goals and red cards

  • 27'⚽ZlinMichal Cupak

Match statistics

Match statistics
PlzenZlin
19Shots15
3Shots on target4
14Shots inside the box11
3Goalkeeper saves3
10Corners3
1Offsides1
66%Possession34%
465Passes248
358Accurate passes

What we expected, and what happened

  • Expected goals before kick-off: Plzen 2.35 · Zlin 0.67. On the pitch: 0-1.
  • Shots Plzen 19 · Zlin 15; on target 3 and 4.
  • Plzen kept the ball more (66%).

Referee

Stanislav Volek, Czechia→

4.17

yellows per match

0.33

reds per match

6

matches of data

6 matches is a small sample — these averages are noisy and should not be read as a tendency.

Model prediction

Why this prediction?

  • ·The model puts the most likely outcome at 75.8%: “Plzen to win”. Second comes “a draw” at 16.6%.
  • ·Behind that distribution are the expected goals: 2.35 for Plzen, 0.67 for Zlin.
  • ·The highest double chance value is 92.4% (1X — Plzen win or draw).
  • ·These values were computed from 842 past matches.

This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.

These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.

Plzen to win75.8%
Draw16.6%
Zlin to win7.6%

When the model has said 75–80% in the past, 735 of 908 predictions were correct (80.9%). Accuracy record →

Both teams to score
155
18Fouls10
3Yellow cards3
0Red cards0

The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.

46.3%

When the model has said 45–50% in the past, 2,093 of 4,437 predictions were correct (47.2%). Accuracy record →

Double chance

1X — Plzen win or draw92.4%
12 — any result other than a draw83.4%
X2 — draw or Zlin win24.2%

These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (16.6%).

First half

Actual: 0–1
Plzen lead at half-time60.9%
Level at half-time31.5%
Zlin lead at half-time7.6%

First-half double chance

1X — Plzen ahead or level92.4%
12 — not level at half-time68.5%
X2 — level or Zlin ahead39.1%

These values are not a fraction of the full-match prediction; they come from a separate model trained on the first-half scores of 842 matches. Its edge over the base rate is markedly smaller than the full-match model's — the measured figure is on the accuracy record. Read them more cautiously. First-half goal markets are not published because they failed to beat the base rate.

Expected fouls and corners

Fouls

Plzen
at least 10Actual: 18
Zlin
at least 13Actual: 10

Corners

Plzen
at least 6Actual: 10
Zlin
at least 3Actual: 3

These figures are set to hold in at least 60% of matches; in the rest the count comes in below them. No upper bound is stated — we make no "at most" claim. Yellow cards were measured and are not published: there our model did not beat the historical average.

Goals market

3+ goals59.0%

When the model has said 55–60% in the past, 2,356 of 4,135 predictions were correct (57.0%). Accuracy record →

The league's historical "3+ goals" rate is 54.4%. For this match the model gives a value above that baseline — and in backtesting the model's edge was confirmed only in this direction.

What these probabilities rest on

Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.

How many goals Plzen score2.35

Attack: Plzen score above the league average (42% more).

Opponent's defence: Zlin concede 17% more than the league average, which pushes the expectation up.

Result: A strong attack meets a weak defence. The effects compound and the expectation rises to 2.35 goals.

How many goals Zlin score0.67

Attack: Zlin score below the league average (26% fewer).

Opponent's defence: Plzen's defence is close to the league average (0.86×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 0.67 goals (including the away penalty).

Most likely scorelines

2–014.0%3–010.9%1–010.7%

A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.

Ratings were computed from 842 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 69 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.