matrisx.com
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccountPricing
TR·EN
TR·EN
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccount
Analytics platform · not a betting siteTrack recordThe last 7 daysLegal noticeRefund policyPrivacyiletisim@matrisx.comFollow on X
← Fixtures

Eredivisie · Netherlands · Regular Season - 11

NAC Breda–GO Ahead Eagles

1–0

HT 0–0

Kick-off
Saturday, 1 November 2025 at 17:45
Status
Match Finished
Venue
Rat Verlegh Stadion, Breda
𝕏Share on X

What the model said, and what happened

✓ Prediction correct

This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record

Goals and red cards

  • 48'⚽NAC BredaJ. Talvitie (assist: Maximilien Balard)

Match statistics

Match statistics
NAC BredaGO Ahead Eagles
8Shots7
2Shots on target2
5Shots inside the box6
2Goalkeeper saves1
2Corners2
1Offsides2
44%Possession56%
385Passes505
311Accurate passes

What we expected, and what happened

  • Expected goals before kick-off: NAC Breda 1.57 · GO Ahead Eagles 1.67. On the pitch: 1-0.
  • Shots NAC Breda 8 · GO Ahead Eagles 7; on target 2 and 2.
  • GO Ahead Eagles kept the ball more (56%).

Referee

Dennis Higler, Netherlands→

1.00

yellows per match

0.00

reds per match

3

matches of data

3 matches is a small sample — these averages are noisy and should not be read as a tendency.

Model prediction

Why this prediction?

  • ·The model puts the most likely outcome at 43.2%: “NAC Breda to win”. Second comes “GO Ahead Eagles to win” at 30.8%.
  • ·Behind that distribution are the expected goals: 1.64 for NAC Breda, 1.37 for GO Ahead Eagles.
  • ·The highest double chance value is 74.0% (12 — any result other than a draw).
  • ·These values were computed from 1,010 past matches.

This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.

These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.

NAC Breda to win43.2%
Draw26.0%
GO Ahead Eagles to win30.8%

When the model has said 40–45% in the past, 1,778 of 3,998 predictions were correct (44.5%). Accuracy record →

413
10Fouls8
4Yellow cards2
0Red cards0

The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.

Both teams to score
63.5%

When the model has said 60–65% in the past, 1,567 of 2,553 predictions were correct (61.4%). Accuracy record →

Double chance

1X — NAC Breda win or draw69.2%
12 — any result other than a draw74.0%
X2 — draw or GO Ahead Eagles win56.8%

These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (26.0%).

First half

Actual: 0–0
NAC Breda lead at half-time31.5%
Level at half-time40.6%
GO Ahead Eagles lead at half-time28.0%

First-half double chance

1X — NAC Breda ahead or level72.0%
12 — not level at half-time59.4%
X2 — level or GO Ahead Eagles ahead68.5%

These values are not a fraction of the full-match prediction; they come from a separate model trained on the first-half scores of 1010 matches. Its edge over the base rate is markedly smaller than the full-match model's — the measured figure is on the accuracy record. Read them more cautiously. First-half goal markets are not published because they failed to beat the base rate.

Expected fouls and corners

Fouls

NAC Breda
at least 9Actual: 10
GO Ahead Eagles
at least 9Actual: 8

Corners

NAC Breda
at least 5Actual: 2
GO Ahead Eagles
at least 4Actual: 2

These figures are set to hold in at least 60% of matches; in the rest the count comes in below them. No upper bound is stated — we make no "at most" claim. Yellow cards were measured and are not published: there our model did not beat the historical average.

Goals market

The 3+ goals prediction is not published for this match.

The model gives a probability below the baseline (60.4%). In backtesting the model's edge in the "fewer goals" direction could not be confirmed; we don't publish an unconfirmed prediction.

What these probabilities rest on

Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.

How many goals NAC Breda score1.57

Attack: NAC Breda score close to the league average.

Opponent's defence: GO Ahead Eagles's defence is close to the league average (1.02×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.57 goals (including home advantage).

How many goals GO Ahead Eagles score1.67

Attack: GO Ahead Eagles score close to the league average.

Opponent's defence: NAC Breda's defence is close to the league average (1.14×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.67 goals (including the away penalty).

Most likely scorelines

1–112.6%2–110.0%1–28.2%

A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.

Ratings were computed from 1010 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 44 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.