matrisx.com
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccountPricing
TR·EN
TR·EN
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccount
Analytics platform · not a betting siteTrack recordThe last 7 daysLegal noticeRefund policyPrivacyiletisim@matrisx.comFollow on X
← Fixtures

Eredivisie · Netherlands · Regular Season - 4

Fortuna Sittard–NEC Nijmegen

3–2

HT 2–1

Kick-off
Sunday, 31 August 2025 at 10:15
Status
Match Finished
Venue
Fortuna Sittard Stadion, Sittard
𝕏Share on X

What the model said, and what happened

✗ Incorrect — we gave this result 31%✓ double chance: correct

This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record

Goals and red cards

  • 4'⚽Fortuna SittardM. Ihattaren (assist: K. Peterson)
  • 28'⚽NEC NijmegenB. Linssen
  • 35'⚽Fortuna SittardM. Ihattaren (penalty)
  • 67'⚽NEC NijmegenS. Ouaissa (assist: V. Misidjan)
  • 90'⚽Fortuna SittardP. Gladon (assist: P. Brittijn)

Match statistics

Match statistics
Fortuna SittardNEC Nijmegen
10Shots14
5Shots on target5
7Shots inside the box10
3Goalkeeper saves2
3Corners4
3Offsides1
38%Possession62%
280Passes445
174Accurate passes

What we expected, and what happened

  • Expected goals before kick-off: Fortuna Sittard 1.39 · NEC Nijmegen 1.52. On the pitch: 3-2.
  • Shots Fortuna Sittard 10 · NEC Nijmegen 14; on target 5 and 5.
  • NEC Nijmegen kept the ball more (62%).

Referee

E. Blank→

3.41

yellows per match

0.10

reds per match

29

matches of data

Model prediction

Why this prediction?

  • ·The model puts the most likely outcome at 42.7%: “NEC Nijmegen to win”. Second comes “Fortuna Sittard to win” at 31.4%.
  • ·Behind that distribution are the expected goals: 1.39 for Fortuna Sittard, 1.64 for NEC Nijmegen.
  • ·The highest double chance value is 74.1% (12 — any result other than a draw).
  • ·These values were computed from 948 past matches.

This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.

These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.

Fortuna Sittard to win31.4%
Draw25.9%
NEC Nijmegen to win42.7%

When the model has said 40–45% in the past, 1,778 of 3,998 predictions were correct (44.5%). Accuracy record →

351
16Fouls8
4Yellow cards1
0Red cards0

The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.

Both teams to score
64.1%

When the model has said 60–65% in the past, 1,567 of 2,553 predictions were correct (61.4%). Accuracy record →

Double chance

1X — Fortuna Sittard win or draw57.3%
12 — any result other than a draw74.1%
X2 — draw or NEC Nijmegen win68.6%

These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (25.9%).

First half

Actual: 2–1
Fortuna Sittard lead at half-time30.1%
Level at half-time44.5%
NEC Nijmegen lead at half-time25.4%

First-half double chance

1X — Fortuna Sittard ahead or level74.6%
12 — not level at half-time55.5%
X2 — level or NEC Nijmegen ahead69.9%

These values are not a fraction of the full-match prediction; they come from a separate model trained on the first-half scores of 948 matches. Its edge over the base rate is markedly smaller than the full-match model's — the measured figure is on the accuracy record. Read them more cautiously. First-half goal markets are not published because they failed to beat the base rate.

Expected fouls and corners

Fouls

Fortuna Sittard
at least 10Actual: 16
NEC Nijmegen
at least 10Actual: 8

Corners

Fortuna Sittard
at least 5Actual: 3
NEC Nijmegen
at least 4Actual: 4

These figures are set to hold in at least 60% of matches; in the rest the count comes in below them. No upper bound is stated — we make no "at most" claim. Yellow cards were measured and are not published: there our model did not beat the historical average.

Goals market

The 3+ goals prediction is not published for this match.

The model gives a probability below the baseline (59.7%). In backtesting the model's edge in the "fewer goals" direction could not be confirmed; we don't publish an unconfirmed prediction.

What these probabilities rest on

Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.

How many goals Fortuna Sittard score1.39

Attack: Fortuna Sittard score below the league average (19% fewer).

Opponent's defence: NEC Nijmegen's defence is close to the league average (0.92×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.39 goals (including home advantage).

How many goals NEC Nijmegen score1.52

Attack: NEC Nijmegen score close to the league average.

Opponent's defence: Fortuna Sittard's defence is close to the league average (1.00×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.52 goals (including the away penalty).

Most likely scorelines

1–112.5%1–29.9%2–18.3%

A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.

Ratings were computed from 948 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 104 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.