Eliteserien · Norway · Regular Season - 29
HT 0–1
The match was not played; the result was awarded. With no result produced on the pitch, it is not used to train the model.
Share on X4.31
yellows per match
0.08
reds per match
13
matches of data
13 matches is a small sample — these averages are noisy and should not be read as a tendency.
This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.
These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.
When the model has said 55–60% in the past, 1,651 of 2,775 predictions were correct (59.5%). Accuracy record →
When the model has said 60–65% in the past, 2,215 of 3,677 predictions were correct (60.2%). Accuracy record →
These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (23.4%).
First-half double chance
These values are not a fraction of the full-match prediction; they come from a separate model trained on the first-half scores of 946 matches. Its edge over the base rate is markedly smaller than the full-match model's — the measured figure is on the accuracy record. Read them more cautiously. First-half goal markets are not published because they failed to beat the base rate.
Fouls
Corners
These figures are set to hold in at least 60% of matches; in the rest the count comes in below them. No upper bound is stated — we make no "at most" claim. Yellow cards were measured and are not published: there our model did not beat the historical average.
When the model has said 60–65% in the past, 1,726 of 2,749 predictions were correct (62.8%). Accuracy record →
The league's historical "3+ goals" rate is 60.6%. For this match the model gives a value above that baseline — and in backtesting the model's edge was confirmed only in this direction.
Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.
Attack: Valerenga score close to the league average.
Opponent's defence: Kristiansund BK concede 17% more than the league average, which pushes the expectation up.
Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.96 goals (including home advantage).
Attack: Kristiansund BK score below the league average (21% fewer).
Opponent's defence: Valerenga's defence is close to the league average (1.10×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.
Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.16 goals (including the away penalty).
A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.
Ratings were computed from 946 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 88 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.