1. Division · Cyprus · Regular Season - 3

Omonia Nicosia–Akritas

3–0

HT 2–0

Kick-off: Saturday, 13 September 2025 at 16:00
Status: Match Finished

What the model said, and what happened

Prediction correct

This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record

Goals and red cards

34'Omonia NicosiaR. Mmaee
45'Omonia NicosiaA. Chatzigiovanis
59'Omonia NicosiaW. Semedo

What we expected, and what happened

Expected goals before kick-off: Omonia Nicosia 1.25 · Akritas 0.61. On the pitch: 3-0.

Referee

Kyriakos Athanasiou, Cyprus→

4.67

yellows per match

0.33

reds per match

matches of data

3 matches is a small sample — these averages are noisy and should not be read as a tendency.

Model prediction

Why this prediction?

The model puts the most likely outcome at 51.9%: “Omonia Nicosia to win”. Second comes “a draw” at 31.2%.
Behind that distribution are the expected goals: 1.25 for Omonia Nicosia, 0.61 for Akritas.
The highest double chance value is 83.0% (1X — Omonia Nicosia win or draw).
These values were computed from 645 past matches.

This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.

These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.

Omonia Nicosia to win51.9%

Draw31.2%

Akritas to win17.0%

When the model has said 50–55% in the past, 1,798 of 3,471 predictions were correct (51.8%). Accuracy record →

First half

Actual: 2–0

Omonia Nicosia lead at half-time30.2%

Level at half-time48.2%

Akritas lead at half-time21.6%

First-half double chance

1X — Omonia Nicosia ahead or level78.4%

12 — not level at half-time51.8%

X2 — level or Akritas ahead69.8%

These values are not a fraction of the full-match prediction; they come from a separate model trained on the first-half scores of 644 matches. Its edge over the base rate is markedly smaller than the full-match model's — the measured figure is on the accuracy record. Read them more cautiously. First-half goal markets are not published because they failed to beat the base rate.

Expected fouls and corners

Fouls

Omonia Nicosia: at least 10
Akritas: at least 12

Corners

Omonia Nicosia: at least 6
Akritas: at least 3

These figures are set to hold in at least 60% of matches; in the rest the count comes in below them. No upper bound is stated — we make no "at most" claim. Yellow cards were measured and are not published: there our model did not beat the historical average.

What these probabilities rest on

Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.

How many goals Omonia Nicosia score1.25

Attack: Omonia Nicosia score above the league average (47% more).

Opponent's defence: Akritas concede 50% below the league average — a defence that seriously brakes even a strong attack.

Result: A strong attack meets a strong defence. The two largely cancel and the expectation drops to 1.25 goals — markedly lower than the attack alone would promise.

How many goals Akritas score0.61

Attack: Akritas score below the league average (54% fewer).

Opponent's defence: Omonia Nicosia's defence is close to the league average (0.89×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 0.61 goals (including the away penalty).

Most likely scorelines

1–019.1%0–015.0%1–113.7%

A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.

Week 3 of the season. This prediction was computed from previous seasons. Summer transfers, budget changes and squad rebuilds aren't in the ratings yet — the model can only see that a team has been rebuilt once new results come in.

We measured this: the bias is only pronounced in the opening week. In this week the model's overall accuracy does not separate from the rest of the season — that is, we found no measurable flaw. The one tendency across all opening weeks is that home wins are called slightly too often (said 43.0%, got 41.9%; n=583).

This sample is small and not statistically established, which is why we do not correct the model for it. The correction we tried (pulling probabilities toward the league average) didn't win on holdout, so it wasn't added. Read opening-week predictions with a little more caution.