matrisx.com
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccountPricing
TR·EN
TR·EN
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccount
Analytics platform · not a betting siteTrack recordThe last 7 daysLegal noticeRefund policyPrivacyiletisim@matrisx.comFollow on X
← Fixtures

Jupiler Pro League · Belgium · Regular Season - 21

KVC Westerlo–Cercle Brugge

0–2

HT 0–2

Kick-off
Saturday, 17 January 2026 at 17:15
Status
Match Finished
Venue
Het Kuipje, Westerlo
𝕏Share on X

What the model said, and what happened

✗ Incorrect — we gave this result 33%✓ double chance: correct

This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record

Goals and red cards

  • 6'⚽Cercle BruggeEmin Bayram (own goal)
  • 39'⚽Cercle BruggeO. Adewumi (assist: G. Magnée)

Match statistics

Match statistics
KVC WesterloCercle Brugge
17Shots8
6Shots on target2
12Shots inside the box6
1Goalkeeper saves6
7Corners4
0Offsides5
69%Possession31%
560Passes253
451Accurate passes

What we expected, and what happened

  • Expected goals before kick-off: KVC Westerlo 1.69 · Cercle Brugge 1.25. On the pitch: 0-2.
  • Shots KVC Westerlo 17 · Cercle Brugge 8; on target 6 and 2.
  • KVC Westerlo kept the ball more (69%).

Referee

B. Put→

3.70

yellows per match

0.20

reds per match

66

matches of data

Model prediction

Why this prediction?

  • ·The model puts the most likely outcome at 41.3%: “KVC Westerlo to win”. Second comes “Cercle Brugge to win” at 33.1%.
  • ·Behind that distribution are the expected goals: 1.66 for KVC Westerlo, 1.48 for Cercle Brugge.
  • ·The highest double chance value is 74.4% (12 — any result other than a draw).
  • ·These values were computed from 1,018 past matches.

This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.

These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.

KVC Westerlo to win41.3%
Draw25.6%
Cercle Brugge to win33.1%

When the model has said 40–45% in the past, 2,356 of 5,296 predictions were correct (44.5%). Accuracy record →

156
11Fouls11
0Yellow cards4
0Red cards0

The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.

Both teams to score
65.9%

When the model has said 65–70% in the past, 764 of 1,176 predictions were correct (65.0%). Accuracy record →

Double chance

1X — KVC Westerlo win or draw66.9%
12 — any result other than a draw74.4%
X2 — draw or Cercle Brugge win58.7%

These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (25.6%).

First half

Actual: 0–2
KVC Westerlo lead at half-time38.1%
Level at half-time39.1%
Cercle Brugge lead at half-time22.8%

First-half double chance

1X — KVC Westerlo ahead or level77.2%
12 — not level at half-time60.9%
X2 — level or Cercle Brugge ahead61.9%

These values are not a fraction of the full-match prediction; they come from a separate model trained on the first-half scores of 1018 matches. Its edge over the base rate is markedly smaller than the full-match model's — the measured figure is on the accuracy record. Read them more cautiously. First-half goal markets are not published because they failed to beat the base rate.

Expected fouls and corners

Fouls

KVC Westerlo
at least 11Actual: 11
Cercle Brugge
at least 11Actual: 11

Corners

KVC Westerlo
at least 5Actual: 7
Cercle Brugge
at least 4Actual: 4

These figures are set to hold in at least 60% of matches; in the rest the count comes in below them. No upper bound is stated — we make no "at most" claim. Yellow cards were measured and are not published: there our model did not beat the historical average.

Goals market

3+ goals61.6%

When the model has said 60–65% in the past, 1,726 of 2,749 predictions were correct (62.8%). Accuracy record →

The league's historical "3+ goals" rate is 53.0%. For this match the model gives a value above that baseline — and in backtesting the model's edge was confirmed only in this direction.

What these probabilities rest on

Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.

How many goals KVC Westerlo score1.69

Attack: KVC Westerlo score close to the league average.

Opponent's defence: Cercle Brugge's defence is close to the league average (1.09×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.69 goals (including home advantage).

How many goals Cercle Brugge score1.25

Attack: Cercle Brugge score close to the league average.

Opponent's defence: KVC Westerlo's defence is close to the league average (1.11×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.25 goals (including the away penalty).

Most likely scorelines

1–112.1%2–19.7%1–28.5%

A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.

Ratings were computed from 1018 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 114 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.