1. SNL · Slovenia · Regular Season - 5
HT 1–1
Ended level — we gave the draw 27%
This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record
3.80
yellows per match
0.12
reds per match
25
matches of data
This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.
These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.
When the model has said 35–40% in the past, 2,093 of 5,647 predictions were correct (37.1%). Accuracy record →
When the model has said 55–60% in the past, 3,527 of 6,231 predictions were correct (56.6%). Accuracy record →
These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (27.4%).
First-half double chance
These values are not a fraction of the full-match prediction; they come from a separate model trained on the first-half scores of 381 matches. Its edge over the base rate is markedly smaller than the full-match model's — the measured figure is on the accuracy record. Read them more cautiously. First-half goal markets are not published because they failed to beat the base rate.
Fouls
Corners
These figures are set to hold in at least 60% of matches; in the rest the count comes in below them. No upper bound is stated — we make no "at most" claim. Yellow cards were measured and are not published: there our model did not beat the historical average.
When the model has said 50–55% in the past, 2,683 of 4,996 predictions were correct (53.7%). Accuracy record →
The league's historical "3+ goals" rate is 47.9%. For this match the model gives a value above that baseline — and in backtesting the model's edge was confirmed only in this direction.
Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.
Attack: Olimpija Ljubljana score above the league average (28% more).
Opponent's defence: Celje concede 20% fewer than the league average, which pulls the expectation down.
Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.46 goals (including home advantage).
Attack: Celje score above the league average (50% more).
Opponent's defence: Olimpija Ljubljana concede 26% fewer than the league average, which pulls the expectation down.
Result: A strong attack meets a strong defence. The two largely cancel and the expectation drops to 1.32 goals — markedly lower than the attack alone would promise.
A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.
Ratings were computed from 382 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 75 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.