UEFA Europa Conference League · 3rd Qualifying Round
HT 1–0
Too close to call — we gave this result 39%
This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record
| Tromso | CFR 1907 Cluj | |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Shots | 0 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 1 |
| 0 | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| 9 | Corners | 0 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0 |
| 68% | Possession | 32% |
| 0 | Passes | 0 |
| 0 | Accurate passes |
4.43
yellows per match
0.16
reds per match
61
matches of data
This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.
These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.
When the model has said 35–40% in the past, 1,562 of 4,187 predictions were correct (37.3%). Accuracy record →
| 0 |
| 17 | Fouls | 14 |
|---|
| 1 | Yellow cards | 2 |
|---|
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
|---|
The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.
When the model has said 50–55% in the past, 2,597 of 5,092 predictions were correct (51.0%). Accuracy record →
These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (25.2%).
The 3+ goals prediction is not published for this match.
The model gives a probability below the baseline (51.5%). In backtesting the model's edge in the "fewer goals" direction could not be confirmed; we don't publish an unconfirmed prediction.
Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.
Attack: Tromso score close to the league average.
Opponent's defence: CFR 1907 Cluj's defence is close to the league average (0.87×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.
Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.38 goals (including home advantage).
Attack: CFR 1907 Cluj score above the league average (21% more).
Opponent's defence: Tromso concede 18% fewer than the league average, which pulls the expectation down.
Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.30 goals (including the away penalty).
A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.
Ratings were computed from 2199 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 136 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.