UEFA Champions League · 3rd Qualifying Round
HT 0–0
The match was decided in extra time. The score covers more than 90 minutes, so it is not used to train the model.
Share on XEnded level — we gave the draw 26%
This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record
| Bodo/Glimt | Union St. Gilloise | |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | Shots | 19 |
| 9 | Shots on target | 5 |
| 17 | Shots inside the box | 15 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| 10 | Corners | 1 |
| 1 | Offsides | 4 |
| 70% | Possession | 30% |
| 999 | Passes | 427 |
| 889 | Accurate passes |
5.06
yellows per match
0.22
reds per match
86
matches of data
This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.
These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.
When the model has said 40–45% in the past, 2,518 of 5,655 predictions were correct (44.5%). Accuracy record →
| 335 |
| 11 | Fouls | 10 |
|---|
| 2 | Yellow cards | 4 |
|---|
| 0 | Red cards | 1 |
|---|
The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.
When the model has said 45–50% in the past, 2,232 of 4,768 predictions were correct (46.8%). Accuracy record →
These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (26.1%).
The 3+ goals prediction is not published for this match.
The model gives a probability below the baseline (56.2%). In backtesting the model's edge in the "fewer goals" direction could not be confirmed; we don't publish an unconfirmed prediction.
Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.
Attack: Bodo/Glimt score 61% more than the league's average team — one of the sharpest attacks in the league.
Opponent's defence: Union St. Gilloise concede 39% below the league average — a defence that seriously brakes even a strong attack.
Result: A strong attack meets a strong defence. The two largely cancel and the expectation drops to 1.37 goals — markedly lower than the attack alone would promise.
Attack: Union St. Gilloise score above the league average (19% more).
Opponent's defence: Bodo/Glimt concede 38% below the league average — a defence that seriously brakes even a strong attack.
Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.11 goals (including the away penalty).
A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.
Ratings were computed from 2223 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 137 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.