UEFA Champions League · 3rd Qualifying Round
HT 0–0
Ended level — we gave the draw 21%double chance: correct
This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record
| Olympiakos Piraeus | NEC Nijmegen | |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Shots | 13 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 4 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| 5 | Corners | 2 |
| 2 | Offsides | 6 |
| 54% | Possession | 46% |
| 397 | Passes | 348 |
| 265 | Accurate passes |
4.88
yellows per match
0.28
reds per match
32
matches of data
This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.
These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.
When the model has said 60–65% in the past, 847 of 1,354 predictions were correct (62.6%). Accuracy record →
| 255 |
| 11 | Fouls | 16 |
|---|
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1 |
|---|
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
|---|
The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.
When the model has said 45–50% in the past, 1,425 of 3,100 predictions were correct (46.0%). Accuracy record →
These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (20.8%).
The 3+ goals prediction is not published for this match.
The model gives a probability below the baseline (56.2%). In backtesting the model's edge in the "fewer goals" direction could not be confirmed; we don't publish an unconfirmed prediction.
Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.
Attack: Olympiakos Piraeus score 57% more than the league's average team — one of the sharpest attacks in the league.
Opponent's defence: NEC Nijmegen's defence is close to the league average (0.94×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.
Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.91 goals (including home advantage).
Attack: NEC Nijmegen score above the league average (20% more).
Opponent's defence: Olympiakos Piraeus concede 55% below the league average — a defence that seriously brakes even a strong attack.
Result: These two effects give an expectation of 0.79 goals (including the away penalty).
A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.
Ratings were computed from 2036 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 136 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.