UEFA Champions League · Round of 16
HT 1–1
Incorrect — we gave this result 34%double chance: correct
This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record
| Manchester City | Real Madrid | |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | Shots | 14 |
| 8 | Shots on target | 7 |
| 14 | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 7 |
| 9 | Corners | 6 |
| 2 | Offsides | 3 |
| 47% | Possession | 53% |
| 484 | Passes | 549 |
| 444 | Accurate passes |
3.39
yellows per match
0.17
reds per match
101
matches of data
This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.
These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.
When the model has said 40–45% in the past, 1,778 of 3,998 predictions were correct (44.5%). Accuracy record →
| 504 |
| 6 | Fouls | 7 |
|---|
| 1 | Yellow cards | 2 |
|---|
| 1 | Red cards | 0 |
|---|
The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.
When the model has said 60–65% in the past, 1,567 of 2,553 predictions were correct (61.4%). Accuracy record →
These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (23.1%).
The 3+ goals prediction is not published for this match.
The model gives a probability below the baseline (56.9%). In backtesting the model's edge in the "fewer goals" direction could not be confirmed; we don't publish an unconfirmed prediction.
Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.
Attack: Manchester City score above the league average (32% more).
Opponent's defence: Real Madrid concede 19% fewer than the league average, which pulls the expectation down.
Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.64 goals (including home advantage).
Attack: Real Madrid score 55% more than the league's average team — one of the sharpest attacks in the league.
Opponent's defence: Manchester City concede 22% fewer than the league average, which pulls the expectation down.
Result: A strong attack meets a strong defence. The two largely cancel and the expectation drops to 1.45 goals — markedly lower than the attack alone would promise.
A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.
Ratings were computed from 2861 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 142 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.