UEFA Champions League · Round of 32
HT 1–1
Incorrect — we gave this result 24%double chance: correct
This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record
| Bodo/Glimt | Inter | |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Shots | 15 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 4 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 13 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 3 | Corners | 3 |
| 0 | Offsides | 3 |
| 42% | Possession | 58% |
| 452 | Passes | 607 |
| 365 | Accurate passes |
4.62
yellows per match
0.19
reds per match
93
matches of data
This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.
These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.
When the model has said 50–55% in the past, 1,337 of 2,542 predictions were correct (52.6%). Accuracy record →
| 527 |
| 12 | Fouls | 6 |
|---|
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
|---|
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
|---|
The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.
When the model has said 60–65% in the past, 1,567 of 2,553 predictions were correct (61.4%). Accuracy record →
These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (21.1%).
The 3+ goals prediction is not published for this match.
The model gives a probability below the baseline (56.5%). In backtesting the model's edge in the "fewer goals" direction could not be confirmed; we don't publish an unconfirmed prediction.
Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.
Attack: Bodo/Glimt score 62% more than the league's average team — one of the sharpest attacks in the league.
Opponent's defence: Inter concede 30% fewer than the league average, which pulls the expectation down.
Result: A strong attack meets a strong defence. The two largely cancel and the expectation drops to 1.26 goals — markedly lower than the attack alone would promise.
Attack: Inter score 60% more than the league's average team — one of the sharpest attacks in the league.
Opponent's defence: Bodo/Glimt concede 30% below the league average — a defence that seriously brakes even a strong attack.
Result: A strong attack meets a strong defence. The two largely cancel and the expectation drops to 1.99 goals — markedly lower than the attack alone would promise.
A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.
Ratings were computed from 2349 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 120 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.