UEFA Europa Conference League · Knockout Round Play-offs
HT 1–1
Ended level — we gave the draw 23%
This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record
| Celje | Apoel Nicosia | |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Shots | 7 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 2 | Corners | 2 |
| 0 | Offsides | 0 |
| 60% | Possession | 40% |
| 487 | Passes | 320 |
| 416 | Accurate passes |
4.20
yellows per match
0.07
reds per match
15
matches of data
This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.
These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.
When the model has said 45–50% in the past, 1,541 of 3,251 predictions were correct (47.4%). Accuracy record →
| 259 |
| 17 | Fouls | 17 |
|---|
| 1 | Yellow cards | 5 |
|---|
| 0 | Red cards | 1 |
|---|
The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.
When the model has said 55–60% in the past, 2,566 of 4,458 predictions were correct (57.6%). Accuracy record →
These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (23.0%).
The 3+ goals prediction is not published for this match.
The model gives a probability below the baseline (50.9%). In backtesting the model's edge in the "fewer goals" direction could not be confirmed; we don't publish an unconfirmed prediction.
Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.
Attack: Celje score above the league average (43% more).
Opponent's defence: Apoel Nicosia concede 37% below the league average — a defence that seriously brakes even a strong attack.
Result: A strong attack meets a strong defence. The two largely cancel and the expectation drops to 1.32 goals — markedly lower than the attack alone would promise.
Attack: Apoel Nicosia score above the league average (46% more).
Opponent's defence: Celje's defence is close to the league average (1.01×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.
Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.72 goals (including the away penalty).
A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.
Ratings were computed from 1037 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 92 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.