UEFA Europa League · 2nd Qualifying Round
HT 0–3
Prediction correct
This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record
| Maccabi Petah Tikva | SC Braga | |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Shots | 0 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 0 |
| 0 | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| 0 | Corners | 0 |
| 0 | Offsides | 0 |
| 0 | Passes | 0 |
| 0 | Accurate passes | 0 |
| 0 | Fouls | 0 |
4.52
yellows per match
0.30
reds per match
33
matches of data
This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.
These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.
When the model has said 75–80% in the past, 735 of 908 predictions were correct (80.9%). Accuracy record →
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1 |
|---|
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
|---|
The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.
When the model has said 60–65% in the past, 2,215 of 3,677 predictions were correct (60.2%). Accuracy record →
These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (12.2%).
The 3+ goals prediction is not published for this match.
The model gives a probability below the baseline (55.2%). In backtesting the model's edge in the "fewer goals" direction could not be confirmed; we don't publish an unconfirmed prediction.
Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.
Attack: Maccabi Petah Tikva score close to the league average.
Opponent's defence: SC Braga's defence is close to the league average (0.98×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.
Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.03 goals (including home advantage).
Attack: SC Braga score above the league average (42% more).
Opponent's defence: Maccabi Petah Tikva concede 36% more than the league average — the defence is the weakest link in this match.
Result: A strong attack meets a weak defence. The effects compound and the expectation rises to 3.13 goals.
A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.
Ratings were computed from 1036 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 26 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.