matrisx.com
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccountPricing
TR·EN
TR·EN
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccount
Analytics platform · not a betting siteTrack recordThe last 7 daysLegal noticeRefund policyPrivacyiletisim@matrisx.comFollow on X
← Fixtures

2. Bundesliga · Germany · Regular Season - 2

1. FC Kaiserslautern–Karlsruher SC

0–0

HT 0–0

Kick-off
Saturday, 15 August 2026 at 18:30
Status
Match Finished
Venue
Fritz Walter Stadion, Kaiserslautern
𝕏Share on X

What the model said, and what happened

✗ Ended level — we gave the draw 24%

This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record

Match statistics

Match statistics
1. FC KaiserslauternKarlsruher SC
11Shots13
3Shots on target8
8Shots inside the box5
8Goalkeeper saves2
4Corners11
1Offsides1
51%Possession49%
378Passes363
290Accurate passes

What we expected, and what happened

  • Expected goals before kick-off: 1. FC Kaiserslautern 1.93 · Karlsruher SC 1.30. On the pitch: 0-0.
  • Shots 1. FC Kaiserslautern 11 · Karlsruher SC 13; on target 3 and 8.

Referee

Richard Hempel, Germany→

5.80

yellows per match

0.40

reds per match

5

matches of data

5 matches is a small sample — these averages are noisy and should not be read as a tendency.

Model prediction

Why this prediction?

  • ·The model puts the most likely outcome at 51.9%: “1. FC Kaiserslautern to win”. Second comes “Karlsruher SC to win” at 24.2%.
  • ·Behind that distribution are the expected goals: 1.93 for 1. FC Kaiserslautern, 1.30 for Karlsruher SC.
  • ·The highest double chance value is 76.2% (12 — any result other than a draw).
  • ·These values were computed from 1,238 past matches.

This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.

These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.

1. FC Kaiserslautern to win51.9%
Draw23.8%
Karlsruher SC to win24.2%

When the model has said 50–55% in the past, 1,337 of 2,542 predictions were correct (52.6%). Accuracy record →

286
12Fouls19
3Yellow cards3
0Red cards0

The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.

Both teams to score65.5%

When the model has said 65–70% in the past, 575 of 859 predictions were correct (66.9%). Accuracy record →

Double chance

1X — 1. FC Kaiserslautern win or draw75.8%
12 — any result other than a draw76.2%
X2 — draw or Karlsruher SC win48.1%

These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (23.8%).

First half

Actual: 0–0
1. FC Kaiserslautern lead at half-time39.3%
Level at half-time40.1%
Karlsruher SC lead at half-time20.6%

First-half double chance

1X — 1. FC Kaiserslautern ahead or level79.4%
12 — not level at half-time59.9%
X2 — level or Karlsruher SC ahead60.7%

These values are not a fraction of the full-match prediction; they come from a separate model trained on the first-half scores of 1238 matches. Its edge over the base rate is markedly smaller than the full-match model's — the measured figure is on the accuracy record. Read them more cautiously. First-half goal markets are not published because they failed to beat the base rate.

Expected fouls and corners

Fouls

1. FC Kaiserslautern
at least 10Actual: 12
Karlsruher SC
at least 12Actual: 19

Corners

1. FC Kaiserslautern
at least 4Actual: 4
Karlsruher SC
at least 4Actual: 11

These figures are set to hold in at least 60% of matches; in the rest the count comes in below them. No upper bound is stated — we make no "at most" claim. Yellow cards were measured and are not published: there our model did not beat the historical average.

Goals market

3+ goals63.8%

When the model has said 60–65% in the past, 1,139 of 1,798 predictions were correct (63.3%). Accuracy record →

The league's historical "3+ goals" rate is 59.1%. For this match the model gives a value above that baseline — and in backtesting the model's edge was confirmed only in this direction.

What these probabilities rest on

Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.

How many goals 1. FC Kaiserslautern score1.93

Attack: 1. FC Kaiserslautern score close to the league average.

Opponent's defence: Karlsruher SC concede 16% more than the league average, which pushes the expectation up.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.93 goals (including home advantage).

How many goals Karlsruher SC score1.30

Attack: Karlsruher SC score close to the league average.

Opponent's defence: 1. FC Kaiserslautern's defence is close to the league average (1.01×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.30 goals (including the away penalty).

Most likely scorelines

1–111.1%2–110.6%2–07.3%

A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.

Ratings were computed from 1238 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 137 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.

Week 2 of the season. This prediction was computed from previous seasons. Summer transfers, budget changes and squad rebuilds aren't in the ratings yet — the model can only see that a team has been rebuilt once new results come in.

We measured this: the bias is only pronounced in the opening week. In this week the model's overall accuracy does not separate from the rest of the season — that is, we found no measurable flaw. The one tendency across all opening weeks is that home wins are called slightly too often (said 43.0%, got 41.9%; n=583).

This sample is small and not statistically established, which is why we do not correct the model for it. The correction we tried (pulling probabilities toward the league average) didn't win on holdout, so it wasn't added. Read opening-week predictions with a little more caution.