Ligue 2 · France · Regular Season - 6
HT 0–0
Prediction correct
This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record
| Montpellier | PAU | |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Shots | 11 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 6 | Corners | 3 |
| 0 | Offsides | 1 |
| 74% | Possession | 26% |
| 732 | Passes | 260 |
| 663 | Accurate passes |
Formation: 4-1-4-1 · Manager: Z. Camara
The referee for this match hasn't been announced by the data provider yet. We don't guess it.
This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.
These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.
When the model has said 50–55% in the past, 1,337 of 2,541 predictions were correct (52.6%). Accuracy record →
| 186 |
| 13 | Fouls | 17 |
|---|
| 2 | Yellow cards | 3 |
|---|
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
|---|
The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.
Formation: 5-3-2 · Manager: Thierry Debes
Lineups are announced about an hour before kick-off and can still change until the first whistle. The list is shown exactly as the provider sends it and does not feed the prediction. Last updated: Friday, 11 September 2026 at 18:14.
When the model has said 50–55% in the past, 2,597 of 5,092 predictions were correct (51.0%). Accuracy record →
These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (26.4%).
First-half double chance
These values are not a fraction of the full-match prediction; they come from a separate model trained on the first-half scores of 1415 matches. Its edge over the base rate is markedly smaller than the full-match model's — the measured figure is on the accuracy record. Read them more cautiously. First-half goal markets are not published because they failed to beat the base rate.
Fouls
Corners
These figures are set to hold in at least 60% of matches; in the rest the count comes in below them. No upper bound is stated — we make no "at most" claim. Yellow cards were measured and are not published: there our model did not beat the historical average.
When the model has said 50–55% in the past, 1,761 of 3,286 predictions were correct (53.6%). Accuracy record →
The league's historical "3+ goals" rate is 46.4%. For this match the model gives a value above that baseline — and in backtesting the model's edge was confirmed only in this direction.
Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.
Attack: Montpellier score close to the league average.
Opponent's defence: PAU concede 19% more than the league average, which pushes the expectation up.
Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.58 goals (including home advantage).
Attack: PAU score close to the league average.
Opponent's defence: Montpellier's defence is close to the league average (0.85×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.
Result: These two effects give an expectation of 0.99 goals (including the away penalty).
A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.
Ratings were computed from 1415 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 39 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.