matrisx.com
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccountPricing
TR·EN
TR·EN
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccount
Analytics platform · not a betting siteTrack recordThe last 7 daysLegal noticeRefund policyPrivacyiletisim@matrisx.comFollow on X
← Fixtures

Championship · England · Regular Season - 4

Birmingham–Southampton

1–1

HT 0–1

Kick-off
Tuesday, 1 September 2026 at 19:00
Status
Match Finished
Venue
St. Andrew's @ Knighthead Park, Birmingham
𝕏Share on X

What the model said, and what happened

Too close to call — we gave this result 27%

This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record

Goals and red cards

  • 45+3'⚽SouthamptonK. Schlotterbeck (assist: Léo Scienza)
  • 55'⚽BirminghamA. Priske (assist: P. Roberts)

Match statistics

Match statistics
BirminghamSouthampton
16Shots13
4Shots on target4
11Shots inside the box12
3Goalkeeper saves3
3Corners5
2Offsides5
48%Possession52%
287Passes505
197Accurate passes

What we expected, and what happened

  • Expected goals before kick-off: Birmingham 1.32 · Southampton 1.37. On the pitch: 1-1.
  • Shots Birmingham 16 · Southampton 13; on target 4 and 4.

Unavailable players

Birmingham

  • L. Buchananout · Knee Injury
  • M. Birdout · not in squad
  • M. Leonardout · Achilles Tendon Injury
  • T. Gardner-Hickmanout · injury
  • D. Graydoubtful · not in squad

Southampton

  • C. Janderout · Lacking Match Fitness
  • F. Downesdoubtful · not in squad
  • T. Harwood-Bellisdoubtful · injury

Provider data — may change until the line-ups are announced. Last updated: Wednesday, 16 September 2026 at 15:10.

Referee

A. Backhouse→

4.45

yellows per match

0.10

reds per match

42

matches of data

Model prediction

Why this prediction?

  • ·The model puts the most likely outcome at 37.4%: “Southampton to win”. Second comes “Birmingham to win” at 35.5%.
  • ·Behind that distribution are the expected goals: 1.41 for Birmingham, 1.45 for Southampton.
  • ·The highest double chance value is 72.9% (12 — any result other than a draw).
  • ·These values were computed from 2,250 past matches.

This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.

These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.

Birmingham to win35.5%
Draw27.1%
Southampton to win37.4%

When the model has said 35–40% in the past, 1,562 of 4,187 predictions were correct (37.3%). Accuracy record →

407
12Fouls8
3Yellow cards2
0Red cards0

The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.

Both teams to score
61.1%

When the model has said 60–65% in the past, 1,567 of 2,553 predictions were correct (61.4%). Accuracy record →

Double chance

1X — Birmingham win or draw62.6%
12 — any result other than a draw72.9%
X2 — draw or Southampton win64.5%

These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (27.1%).

First half

Actual: 0–1
Birmingham lead at half-time26.4%
Level at half-time40.6%
Southampton lead at half-time33.0%

First-half double chance

1X — Birmingham ahead or level67.0%
12 — not level at half-time59.4%
X2 — level or Southampton ahead73.6%

These values are not a fraction of the full-match prediction; they come from a separate model trained on the first-half scores of 2250 matches. Its edge over the base rate is markedly smaller than the full-match model's — the measured figure is on the accuracy record. Read them more cautiously. First-half goal markets are not published because they failed to beat the base rate.

Expected fouls and corners

Fouls

Birmingham
at least 11Actual: 12
Southampton
at least 9Actual: 8

Corners

Birmingham
at least 5Actual: 3
Southampton
at least 3Actual: 5

These figures are set to hold in at least 60% of matches; in the rest the count comes in below them. No upper bound is stated — we make no "at most" claim. Yellow cards were measured and are not published: there our model did not beat the historical average.

Goals market

3+ goals55.1%

When the model has said 55–60% in the past, 1,528 of 2,652 predictions were correct (57.6%). Accuracy record →

The league's historical "3+ goals" rate is 48.3%. For this match the model gives a value above that baseline — and in backtesting the model's edge was confirmed only in this direction.

What these probabilities rest on

Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.

How many goals Birmingham score1.32

Attack: Birmingham score close to the league average.

Opponent's defence: Southampton's defence is close to the league average (0.94×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.32 goals (including home advantage).

How many goals Southampton score1.37

Attack: Southampton score above the league average (36% more).

Opponent's defence: Birmingham's defence is close to the league average (0.86×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.37 goals (including the away penalty).

Most likely scorelines

1–113.4%1–29.3%2–19.0%

A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.

Ratings were computed from 2250 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 95 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.