UEFA Nations League · Play-offs C/D
HT 0–0
Too close to call — only 0.9% between the top two
This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record
4.50
yellows per match
0.50
reds per match
4
matches of data
4 matches is a small sample — these averages are noisy and should not be read as a tendency.
This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.
These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.
When the model has said 30–35% in the past, 2,700 of 8,629 predictions were correct (31.3%). Accuracy record →
These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (31.2%).
Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.
Attack: Malta score below the league average (47% fewer).
Opponent's defence: Luxembourg's defence is close to the league average (1.11×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.
Attack: Luxembourg score below the league average (43% fewer).
Opponent's defence: Malta concede 52% more than the league average — the defence is the weakest link in this match.
Ratings were computed from 5464 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 83 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.