UEFA Nations League · League B - 1
Ended level — we gave the draw 30%
This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record
There's no card data for this referee from before this match yet. We don't invent an average; it will appear here once the data exists.
This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.
These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.
When the model has said 35–40% in the past, 2,123 of 5,759 predictions were correct (36.9%). Accuracy record →
These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (29.9%).
Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.
Attack: Slovenia score close to the league average.
Opponent's defence: Austria concede 32% below the league average — a defence that seriously brakes even a strong attack.
Attack: Austria score 51% more than the league's average team — one of the sharpest attacks in the league.
Opponent's defence: Slovenia concede 38% below the league average — a defence that seriously brakes even a strong attack.
Ratings were computed from 4370 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 73 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.
Week 1 of the season. This prediction was computed from previous seasons. Summer transfers, budget changes and squad rebuilds aren't in the ratings yet — the model can only see that a team has been rebuilt once new results come in.
We measured this and we're not hiding it: in the opening week of past seasons the model came in 3.3 points below the accuracy it claimed (n=220) — for the rest of the season it beats its own claim. The tendency points this way, though it is not proof on its own: in the opening week it slightly over-calls home wins (said 42.7%, got 39.5%) and slightly under-calls draws (said 26.1%, got 28.2%).
This sample is small and not statistically established, which is why we do not correct the model for it. The correction we tried (pulling probabilities toward the league average) didn't win on holdout, so it wasn't added. Read opening-week predictions with a little more caution.