matrisx.com
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccountPricing
TR·EN
TR·EN
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccount
Analytics platform · not a betting siteTrack recordThe last 7 daysLegal noticeRefund policyPrivacyiletisim@matrisx.comFollow on X
← Fixtures

Championship · England · Regular Season - 13

QPR–Ipswich

1–4

HT 1–1

Kick-off
Saturday, 1 November 2025 at 15:00
Status
Match Finished
𝕏Share on X

What the model said, and what happened

✓ Prediction correct

This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record

Goals and red cards

  • 2'⚽IpswichG. Hirst (assist: S. W. Egeli)
  • 21'⚽QPRR. Burrell
  • 47'⚽IpswichM. Núñez
  • 57'⚽IpswichG. Hirst (assist: Darnell Furlong)
  • 64'⚽IpswichM. Núñez

Match statistics

Match statistics
QPRIpswich
12Shots12
5Shots on target7
5Shots inside the box6
3Goalkeeper saves4
3Corners2
2Offsides2
38%Possession62%
290Passes478
201Accurate passes

What we expected, and what happened

  • Expected goals before kick-off: QPR 1.06 · Ipswich 1.47. On the pitch: 1-4.
  • Shots QPR 12 · Ipswich 12; on target 5 and 7.
  • Ipswich kept the ball more (62%).

Referee

Sam Allison, England→

2.00

yellows per match

0.00

reds per match

1

matches of data

1 matches is a small sample — these averages are noisy and should not be read as a tendency.

Model prediction

Why this prediction?

  • ·The model puts the most likely outcome at 45.1%: “Ipswich to win”. Second comes “QPR to win” at 27.6%.
  • ·Behind that distribution are the expected goals: 1.17 for QPR, 1.53 for Ipswich.
  • ·The highest double chance value is 72.7% (12 — any result other than a draw).
  • ·These values were computed from 1,803 past matches.

This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.

These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.

QPR to win27.6%
Draw27.3%
Ipswich to win45.1%

When the model has said 45–50% in the past, 1,541 of 3,251 predictions were correct (47.4%). Accuracy record →

Both teams to score
373
16Fouls10
4Yellow cards0
0Red cards0

The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.

57.3%

When the model has said 55–60% in the past, 2,566 of 4,458 predictions were correct (57.6%). Accuracy record →

Double chance

1X — QPR win or draw54.9%
12 — any result other than a draw72.7%
X2 — draw or Ipswich win72.4%

These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (27.3%).

First half

Actual: 1–1
QPR lead at half-time19.1%
Level at half-time41.7%
Ipswich lead at half-time39.2%

First-half double chance

1X — QPR ahead or level60.8%
12 — not level at half-time58.3%
X2 — level or Ipswich ahead80.9%

These values are not a fraction of the full-match prediction; they come from a separate model trained on the first-half scores of 1803 matches. Its edge over the base rate is markedly smaller than the full-match model's — the measured figure is on the accuracy record. Read them more cautiously. First-half goal markets are not published because they failed to beat the base rate.

Expected fouls and corners

Fouls

QPR
at least 11Actual: 16
Ipswich
at least 10Actual: 10

Corners

QPR
at least 4Actual: 3
Ipswich
at least 5Actual: 2

These figures are set to hold in at least 60% of matches; in the rest the count comes in below them. No upper bound is stated — we make no "at most" claim. Yellow cards were measured and are not published: there our model did not beat the historical average.

Goals market

3+ goals51.2%

When the model has said 50–55% in the past, 1,761 of 3,286 predictions were correct (53.6%). Accuracy record →

The league's historical "3+ goals" rate is 46.8%. For this match the model gives a value above that baseline — and in backtesting the model's edge was confirmed only in this direction.

What these probabilities rest on

Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.

How many goals QPR score1.06

Attack: QPR score close to the league average.

Opponent's defence: Ipswich's defence is close to the league average (0.89×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.06 goals (including home advantage).

How many goals Ipswich score1.47

Attack: Ipswich score above the league average (37% more).

Opponent's defence: QPR's defence is close to the league average (1.00×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.47 goals (including the away penalty).

Most likely scorelines

1–113.8%1–210.1%0–19.4%

A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.

Ratings were computed from 1803 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 57 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.