matrisx.com
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccountPricing
TR·EN
TR·EN
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccount
Analytics platform · not a betting siteTrack recordThe last 7 daysLegal noticeRefund policyPrivacyiletisim@matrisx.comFollow on X
← Fixtures

Championship · England · Regular Season - 6

QPR–Stoke City

1–0

HT 0–0

Kick-off
Saturday, 20 September 2025 at 11:30
Status
Match Finished
𝕏Share on X

What the model said, and what happened

✗ Incorrect — we gave this result 33%✓ double chance: correct

This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record

Goals and red cards

  • 75'⚽QPRH. Vale

Match statistics

Match statistics
QPRStoke City
14Shots7
7Shots on target1
8Shots inside the box4
0Goalkeeper saves6
3Corners6
1Offsides1
35%Possession65%
244Passes440
170Accurate passes

What we expected, and what happened

  • Expected goals before kick-off: QPR 1.37 · Stoke City 1.08. On the pitch: 1-0.
  • Shots QPR 14 · Stoke City 7; on target 7 and 1.
  • Stoke City kept the ball more (65%).

Referee

Tim Robinson, England→

There's no card data for this referee from before this match yet. We don't invent an average; it will appear here once the data exists.

Model prediction

Why this prediction?

  • ·The model puts the most likely outcome at 38.3%: “Stoke City to win”. Second comes “QPR to win” at 33.1%.
  • ·Behind that distribution are the expected goals: 1.23 for QPR, 1.34 for Stoke City.
  • ·The highest double chance value is 71.4% (12 — any result other than a draw).
  • ·These values were computed from 1,717 past matches.

This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.

These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.

QPR to win33.1%
Draw28.6%
Stoke City to win38.3%

When the model has said 35–40% in the past, 1,562 of 4,187 predictions were correct (37.3%). Accuracy record →

376
8Fouls13
5Yellow cards3
0Red cards0

The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.

Both teams to score
55.4%

When the model has said 55–60% in the past, 2,565 of 4,457 predictions were correct (57.5%). Accuracy record →

Double chance

1X — QPR win or draw61.7%
12 — any result other than a draw71.4%
X2 — draw or Stoke City win66.9%

These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (28.6%).

First half

Actual: 0–0
QPR lead at half-time31.6%
Level at half-time43.8%
Stoke City lead at half-time24.6%

First-half double chance

1X — QPR ahead or level75.4%
12 — not level at half-time56.2%
X2 — level or Stoke City ahead68.4%

These values are not a fraction of the full-match prediction; they come from a separate model trained on the first-half scores of 1717 matches. Its edge over the base rate is markedly smaller than the full-match model's — the measured figure is on the accuracy record. Read them more cautiously. First-half goal markets are not published because they failed to beat the base rate.

Expected fouls and corners

Fouls

QPR
at least 9Actual: 8
Stoke City
at least 11Actual: 13

Corners

QPR
at least 5Actual: 3
Stoke City
at least 4Actual: 6

These figures are set to hold in at least 60% of matches; in the rest the count comes in below them. No upper bound is stated — we make no "at most" claim. Yellow cards were measured and are not published: there our model did not beat the historical average.

Goals market

3+ goals47.8%

When the model has said 45–50% in the past, 1,604 of 3,461 predictions were correct (46.3%). Accuracy record →

The league's historical "3+ goals" rate is 47.0%. For this match the model gives a value above that baseline — and in backtesting the model's edge was confirmed only in this direction.

What these probabilities rest on

Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.

How many goals QPR score1.37

Attack: QPR score close to the league average.

Opponent's defence: Stoke City's defence is close to the league average (1.07×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.37 goals (including home advantage).

How many goals Stoke City score1.08

Attack: Stoke City score close to the league average.

Opponent's defence: QPR's defence is close to the league average (1.03×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.08 goals (including the away penalty).

Most likely scorelines

1–114.5%0–19.3%1–29.2%

A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.

Ratings were computed from 1717 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 143 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.