matrisx.com
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccountPricing
TR·EN
TR·EN
FixturesLeaguesTrack recordAccount
Analytics platform · not a betting siteTrack recordThe last 7 daysLegal noticeRefund policyPrivacyiletisim@matrisx.comFollow on X
← Fixtures

Ligue 2 · France · Regular Season - 34

Quevilly–Amiens

3–3

HT 1–3

Kick-off
Tuesday, 23 April 2024 at 18:45
Status
Match Finished
Venue
Stade Robert Diochon, Le Petit-Quevilly
𝕏Share on X

What the model said, and what happened

✗ Ended level — we gave the draw 30%✓ double chance: correct

This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record

Goals and red cards

  • 20'⚽QuevillyB. Pierret (assist: L. Delaurier-Chaubet)
  • 33'⚽AmiensL. Mafouta (assist: F. Boya)
  • 45+2'⚽AmiensL. Mafouta (penalty)
  • 45+3'⚽AmiensL. Mafouta (assist: K. Kaiboue)
  • 58'⚽QuevillyK. Coulibaly (assist: Garland Gbelle)
  • 81'⚽QuevillyAntoine Batisse

Match statistics

Match statistics
QuevillyAmiens
19Shots10
8Shots on target3
12Shots inside the box7
0Goalkeeper saves5
7Corners0
0Offsides3
58%Possession42%
563Passes422
457Accurate passes

What we expected, and what happened

  • Expected goals before kick-off: Quevilly 1.41 · Amiens 0.89. On the pitch: 3-3.
  • Shots Quevilly 19 · Amiens 10; on target 8 and 3.
  • Quevilly kept the ball more (58%).

Referee

P. Legat→

4.41

yellows per match

0.32

reds per match

34

matches of data

Model prediction

Why this prediction?

  • ·The model puts the most likely outcome at 41.6%: “Quevilly to win”. Second comes “a draw” at 30.3%.
  • ·Behind that distribution are the expected goals: 1.26 for Quevilly, 1.00 for Amiens.
  • ·The highest double chance value is 71.9% (1X — Quevilly win or draw).
  • ·These values were computed from 709 past matches.

This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.

These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.

Quevilly to win41.6%
Draw30.3%
Amiens to win28.1%

When the model has said 40–45% in the past, 1,778 of 3,998 predictions were correct (44.5%). Accuracy record →

Both teams to score
329
15Fouls9
1Yellow cards1
0Red cards0

The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.

48.3%

When the model has said 45–50% in the past, 1,425 of 3,100 predictions were correct (46.0%). Accuracy record →

Double chance

1X — Quevilly win or draw71.9%
12 — any result other than a draw69.7%
X2 — draw or Amiens win58.4%

These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (30.3%).

First half

Actual: 1–3
Quevilly lead at half-time29.7%
Level at half-time46.4%
Amiens lead at half-time23.9%

First-half double chance

1X — Quevilly ahead or level76.1%
12 — not level at half-time53.6%
X2 — level or Amiens ahead70.3%

These values are not a fraction of the full-match prediction; they come from a separate model trained on the first-half scores of 709 matches. Its edge over the base rate is markedly smaller than the full-match model's — the measured figure is on the accuracy record. Read them more cautiously. First-half goal markets are not published because they failed to beat the base rate.

Expected fouls and corners

Fouls

Quevilly
at least 13Actual: 15
Amiens
at least 12Actual: 9

Corners

Quevilly
at least 4
Amiens
at least 3

These figures are set to hold in at least 60% of matches; in the rest the count comes in below them. No upper bound is stated — we make no "at most" claim. Yellow cards were measured and are not published: there our model did not beat the historical average.

Goals market

The 3+ goals prediction is not published for this match.

The model gives a probability below the baseline (44.3%). In backtesting the model's edge in the "fewer goals" direction could not be confirmed; we don't publish an unconfirmed prediction.

What these probabilities rest on

Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.

How many goals Quevilly score1.41

Attack: Quevilly score close to the league average.

Opponent's defence: Amiens's defence is close to the league average (0.95×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.41 goals (including home advantage).

How many goals Amiens score0.89

Attack: Amiens score below the league average (20% fewer).

Opponent's defence: Quevilly's defence is close to the league average (0.95×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.

Result: These two effects give an expectation of 0.89 goals (including the away penalty).

Most likely scorelines

1–115.2%1–012.4%0–010.1%

A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.

Ratings were computed from 709 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 71 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.