UEFA Champions League · Play-offs
HT 2–0
Prediction correct
This verdict goes into the public record unchanged; we do not filter out the ones we get wrong. The model's track record
| Bodo/Glimt | NEC Nijmegen | |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Shots | 3 |
| 9 | Shots on target | 2 |
| 16 | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 7 |
| 4 | Corners | 2 |
| 2 | Offsides | 3 |
| 80% | Possession | 20% |
| 774 | Passes | 185 |
| 703 | Accurate passes |
3.87
yellows per match
0.12
reds per match
147
matches of data
This is a prediction, not a guarantee; a probability is not a certainty.
These sentences are built by a fixed template; every number in them comes straight from the model's computation, none invented while the text was written.
When the model has said 60–65% in the past, 847 of 1,354 predictions were correct (62.6%). Accuracy record →
| 116 |
| 10 | Fouls | 8 |
|---|
| 0 | Yellow cards | 2 |
|---|
| 0 | Red cards | 1 |
|---|
The measurements our data provider sent for this match. A row that was not measured shows “—”; writing 0 into an empty field would claim we measured it and found none.
Provider data — may change until the line-ups are announced. Last updated: Thursday, 17 September 2026 at 06:11.
When the model has said 65–70% in the past, 575 of 859 predictions were correct (66.9%). Accuracy record →
These three values add up to 200%, not 100% — and that is not a mistake. The options are not mutually exclusive; every outcome is counted in two of them. For the same reason 1X plus X2 exceeds 100% by exactly the probability of a draw (17.6%).
The 3+ goals prediction is not published for this match.
The model gives a probability below the baseline (56.2%). In backtesting the model's edge in the "fewer goals" direction could not be confirmed; we don't publish an unconfirmed prediction.
Expected goals comes out of a team's attack weighed against its opponent's defence. A strong attack is damped when it meets a strong defence — which is why comparing the ratings on their own is misleading.
Attack: Bodo/Glimt score 60% more than the league's average team — one of the sharpest attacks in the league.
Opponent's defence: NEC Nijmegen's defence is close to the league average (0.92×), so it doesn't move the expectation much.
Result: These two effects give an expectation of 2.50 goals (including home advantage).
Attack: NEC Nijmegen score above the league average (21% more).
Opponent's defence: Bodo/Glimt concede 38% below the league average — a defence that seriously brakes even a strong attack.
Result: These two effects give an expectation of 1.10 goals (including the away penalty).
A single scoreline is always less likely than an outcome: “home win” is the sum of 1-0, 2-0, 2-1 and dozens more. So the most likely single score can be a draw while the most likely outcome is a home win; the two do not contradict each other.
Ratings were computed from 2343 matches played in this league before kick-off; the team with fewer has 137 matches. No data from after the match was used. The model's track record is published unfiltered.